IMR OpenIR
Extended antimicrobial prophylaxis after gastric cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Alternative TitleExtended antimicrobial prophylaxis after gastric cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Zhang ChunDong; Zeng YongJi; Li Zhen; Chen Jing; Li HongWu; Zhang JiaKui; Dai DongQiu
2013
Source PublicationWORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
ISSN1007-9327
Volume19Issue:13Pages:2104-2109
AbstractAIM: To investigate the efficacy of extended antimicrobial prophylaxis (EAP) after gastrectomy by systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.
Other AbstractAIM: To investigate the efficacy of extended antimicrobial prophylaxis (EAP) after gastrectomy by systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. METHODS: Electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched systematically from January 1980 to October 2012. Strict literature retrieval and data extraction were carried out independently by two reviewers and meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.0.2 with statistics tools risk ratios (RRs) and intention-to-treat analyses to evaluate the items of total complications, surgical site infection, incision infection, organ (or space) infection, remote site infection, anastomotic leakage (or dehiscence) and mortality. Fixed model or random model was selected accordingly and forest plot was conducted to display RR. Likewise, Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was applied to evaluate the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1095 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled in four RCTs. No statistically significant differences were detected between EAP and intraoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis (IAP) in total complications (RR of 0.86, 95%CI: 0.63-1.16, P = 0.32), surgical site infection (RR of 1.97, 95%CI: 0.86-4.48, P = 0.11), incision infection (RR of 4.92, 95%CI: 0.58-41.66, P = 0.14), organ or space infection (RR of 1.55, 95%CI: 0.61-3.89, P = 0.36), anastomotic leakage or dehiscence (RR of 3.85, 95%CI: 0.64-23.17, P = 0.14) and mortality (RR of 1.14, 95%CI: 0.10-13.12; P = 0.92). Likewise, multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis showed no difference compared with single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical site infection (RR of 1.10, 95%CI: 0.62-1.93, P = 0.75). Nevertheless, EAP showed a decreased remote site infection rate compared with IAP alone (RR of 0.54, 95%CI: 0.34-0.86, P = 0.01), which is the only significant finding. Unfortunately, EAP did not decrease the incidence of surgical site infections after gastrectomy; likewise, multipledose antimicrobial prophylaxis failed to decrease the incidence of surgical site infection compared with single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: We recommend that EAP should not be used routinely after gastrectomy until more high-quality RCTs are available.
KeywordSURGICAL SITE INFECTION ANTIBIOTIC-ASSOCIATED DIARRHEA TRIAL COMPARING D2 NODAL DISSECTION RISK-FACTORS DOUBLE-BLIND LYMPHADENECTOMY PREVENTION DECONTAMINATION GASTRECTOMY Gastric cancer Gastrectomy Extended antimicrobial prophylaxis Intraoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis Meta-analysis
Indexed ByCSCD
Language英语
CSCD IDCSCD:5009222
Citation statistics
Document Type期刊论文
Identifierhttp://ir.imr.ac.cn/handle/321006/152347
Collection中国科学院金属研究所
Affiliation中国科学院金属研究所
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
Zhang ChunDong,Zeng YongJi,Li Zhen,et al. Extended antimicrobial prophylaxis after gastric cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY,2013,19(13):2104-2109.
APA Zhang ChunDong.,Zeng YongJi.,Li Zhen.,Chen Jing.,Li HongWu.,...&Dai DongQiu.(2013).Extended antimicrobial prophylaxis after gastric cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY,19(13),2104-2109.
MLA Zhang ChunDong,et al."Extended antimicrobial prophylaxis after gastric cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis".WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 19.13(2013):2104-2109.
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Related Services
Recommend this item
Bookmark
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Zhang ChunDong]'s Articles
[Zeng YongJi]'s Articles
[Li Zhen]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[Zhang ChunDong]'s Articles
[Zeng YongJi]'s Articles
[Li Zhen]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[Zhang ChunDong]'s Articles
[Zeng YongJi]'s Articles
[Li Zhen]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.
 

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.