Extended antimicrobial prophylaxis after gastric cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IMR OpenIR

	Extended antimicrobial prophylaxis after gastric cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
其他题名	Extended antimicrobial prophylaxis after gastric cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
	Zhang ChunDong; Zeng YongJi; Li Zhen; Chen Jing; Li HongWu; Zhang JiaKui; Dai DongQiu
	2013
发表期刊	WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
ISSN	1007-9327
卷号	19 期号:13 页码:2104-2109
摘要	AIM: To investigate the efficacy of extended antimicrobial prophylaxis (EAP) after gastrectomy by systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.
其他摘要	AIM: To investigate the efficacy of extended antimicrobial prophylaxis (EAP) after gastrectomy by systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. METHODS: Electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched systematically from January 1980 to October 2012. Strict literature retrieval and data extraction were carried out independently by two reviewers and meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.0.2 with statistics tools risk ratios (RRs) and intention-to-treat analyses to evaluate the items of total complications, surgical site infection, incision infection, organ (or space) infection, remote site infection, anastomotic leakage (or dehiscence) and mortality. Fixed model or random model was selected accordingly and forest plot was conducted to display RR. Likewise, Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was applied to evaluate the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1095 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled in four RCTs. No statistically significant differences were detected between EAP and intraoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis (IAP) in total complications (RR of 0.86, 95%CI: 0.63-1.16, P = 0.32), surgical site infection (RR of 1.97, 95%CI: 0.86-4.48, P = 0.11), incision infection (RR of 4.92, 95%CI: 0.58-41.66, P = 0.14), organ or space infection (RR of 1.55, 95%CI: 0.61-3.89, P = 0.36), anastomotic leakage or dehiscence (RR of 3.85, 95%CI: 0.64-23.17, P = 0.14) and mortality (RR of 1.14, 95%CI: 0.10-13.12; P = 0.92). Likewise, multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis showed no difference compared with single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical site infection (RR of 1.10, 95%CI: 0.62-1.93, P = 0.75). Nevertheless, EAP showed a decreased remote site infection rate compared with IAP alone (RR of 0.54, 95%CI: 0.34-0.86, P = 0.01), which is the only significant finding. Unfortunately, EAP did not decrease the incidence of surgical site infections after gastrectomy; likewise, multipledose antimicrobial prophylaxis failed to decrease the incidence of surgical site infection compared with single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: We recommend that EAP should not be used routinely after gastrectomy until more high-quality RCTs are available.
关键词	SURGICAL SITE INFECTION ANTIBIOTIC-ASSOCIATED DIARRHEA TRIAL COMPARING D2 NODAL DISSECTION RISK-FACTORS DOUBLE-BLIND LYMPHADENECTOMY PREVENTION DECONTAMINATION GASTRECTOMY Gastric cancer Gastrectomy Extended antimicrobial prophylaxis Intraoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis Meta-analysis
收录类别	CSCD
语种	英语
CSCD记录号	CSCD:5009222
引用统计
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://ir.imr.ac.cn/handle/321006/152347
专题	中国科学院金属研究所
作者单位	中国科学院金属研究所
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Zhang ChunDong,Zeng YongJi,Li Zhen,et al. Extended antimicrobial prophylaxis after gastric cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY,2013,19(13):2104-2109.
APA	Zhang ChunDong.,Zeng YongJi.,Li Zhen.,Chen Jing.,Li HongWu.,...&Dai DongQiu.(2013).Extended antimicrobial prophylaxis after gastric cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY,19(13),2104-2109.
MLA	Zhang ChunDong,et al."Extended antimicrobial prophylaxis after gastric cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis".WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 19.13(2013):2104-2109.